Skip to main content

Brassfield & Krueger, Ltd. Rockford Injury Attorneys Reviews

Rockford, IL

What the public record shows about Brassfield & Krueger, Ltd. Rockford Injury Attorneys — aggregated ratings, State Bar licence status and disciplinary history. We don't rate lawyers ourselves and we don't take referral fees.

Client rating
4.9★ · 68 Google reviews
Licence verified
Yes — 1 attorney checked against the State Bar
Disciplinary record
None found as of 2026-08-27
Years practising
39 — earliest bar admission 1987
Verified by us

State Bar licence verification

We looked this attorney up in the State Bar registry and recorded what it returned. Every row links back to the registry so you can repeat the check yourself.

  • David James Brassfield lead

    IL Bar · admitted 1987

    Active and authorized to practice law No public disciplinary history

Verified against the State Bar of Illinois. Last checked 2026-08-27.

Verifiable

Third-party data

Google reviews

★4.9 /5

68 verified reviews

Office citiesRockford
States licensedIL
LanguagesEnglish
Practice areasPersonal Injury, Truck Accidents

Fees & terms

Availability

  • Consult methods: phone

Questions people ask about Brassfield & Krueger, Ltd. Rockford Injury Attorneys

Is Brassfield & Krueger, Ltd. Rockford Injury Attorneys a real, licensed law firm?

Yes. We checked its lead attorney against the State Bar registry. David James Brassfield holds bar number 00f82497-a964-eb11-b810-000d3a9f4eeb in IL, status active and authorized to practice law, admitted in 1987. Last checked 2026-08-27.

Does Brassfield & Krueger, Ltd. Rockford Injury Attorneys have any disciplinary history?

No public disciplinary record was found for the attorney we checked, as of 2026-08-27. Bars publish only formal public discipline, so this is not a guarantee of a spotless history.

Cities served

Other firms in Rockford, IL

Reviewed by AccidentLawyerReview Editorial Team, Editor · Reviewed 2026-05-22 · Next scheduled review: 2026-08-20 · How we research firms · Spot something wrong? Tell us