Skip to main content

Pintas & Mullins Law Firm Reviews

Chicago, IL

What the public record shows about Pintas & Mullins Law Firm — aggregated ratings, State Bar licence status and disciplinary history. We don't rate lawyers ourselves and we don't take referral fees.

Client rating
4.8★ · 1,677 Google reviews
Licence verified
Yes — 1 attorney checked against the State Bar
Disciplinary record
None found as of 2026-08-27
Years practising
41 — earliest bar admission 1985
Third-party

What clients say about Pintas & Mullins Law Firm

Themes appearing across 10 Google reviews, read in full and grouped. These are reviewers' words, not our assessment — we take no position on any firm's quality.

Praised for

  • responsive and professional communication
  • patient and persistent follow-up
  • empathetic case handling

Criticised for

  • cases dropped without explanation
  • poor handoff after intake process
  • vague case rejection reasons

Source: Google reviews (read them yourself) · Last read 2026-05-26

Verified by us

State Bar licence verification

We looked this attorney up in the State Bar registry and recorded what it returned. Every row links back to the registry so you can repeat the check yourself.

  • William George Pintas lead

    IL Bar · admitted 1985

    Active and authorized to practice law No public disciplinary history

Verified against the State Bar of Illinois. Last checked 2026-08-27.

Verifiable

Third-party data

Google reviews

4.8 /5

1,677 verified reviews

Office citiesChicago
States licensedIL
LanguagesEnglish
Practice areasPersonal Injury, Truck Accidents

Fees & terms

Availability

  • Consult methods: phone
Public record

Court activity

Civil filings in Cook County Circuit Court where William Pintas appears by name.

Cases found21
Personal-injury division1
Active1990–2026

Cook County name search returns cases where the attorney name appears as any party (plaintiff, defendant, or counsel). We cannot programmatically distinguish counsel from party. Click case numbers to verify on the source.

Source: Cook County Circuit Court · Searched 2026-05-26

Firm-claimed

What Pintas & Mullins Law Firm says about itself

These are the firm's own marketing claims, taken from their public site. We can't independently verify settlement totals — most are confidential. Source linked below.

Results the firm advertises

  • $17.65 Million — other · verdict
  • $15 Million — med-mal · settlement
  • $145 Million — product liability · settlement
  • $120 Million — other · settlement
  • $5.7 Million — med-mal · settlement
  • $5.3 Million — premises · settlement
  • $4.59 Million — med-mal · settlement
  • $4.5 Million — med-mal · settlement

Firm-claimed verdicts and settlements from the firm's own marketing page. NOT independently verified court records.

Source: https://www.pintas.com/?utm_source=binggoogle&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=gmb-listing-chicago · Last checked 2026-05-25

Questions people ask about Pintas & Mullins Law Firm

Is Pintas & Mullins Law Firm a real, licensed law firm?

Yes. We checked its lead attorney against the State Bar registry. William George Pintas holds bar number 2d5c2fc0-aa64-eb11-b810-000d3a9f4eeb in IL, status active and authorized to practice law, admitted in 1985. Last checked 2026-08-27.

What do clients say about Pintas & Mullins Law Firm?

Across 10 Google reviews we read in full, clients most often mention responsive and professional communication, patient and persistent follow-up, empathetic case handling. Recurring criticism centres on cases dropped without explanation, poor handoff after intake process. These are reviewers' words; we take no position on any firm's quality.

Does Pintas & Mullins Law Firm have any disciplinary history?

No public disciplinary record was found for the attorney we checked, as of 2026-08-27. Bars publish only formal public discipline, so this is not a guarantee of a spotless history.

Reviewed by AccidentLawyerReview Editorial Team, Editor · Reviewed 2026-05-25 · Next scheduled review: 2026-08-23 · How we research firms · Spot something wrong? Tell us